[Notes from Personal Democracy Forum 2007 in New York]
The digital divide is getting worse. Ten years ago companies etc weren’t all networked. In ten years everyone in power has massive network access, but the disadvantaged still have next to none.

But in New York city today the average kid spends one hour a week using a computer. Call for action: Who is America’s first tech president? They have six questions or points they want candidates to either endorse or offer alternatives to.

  1. Let’s declare the internet a public good. Make it as ubiquitous as clean water. It should be everywhere.
  2. Copyright and control: we need to guarantee that wireless public spectrum is available and free – wifi, not proprietary cables.
  3. Go from no child left behind to each child connected.
  4. Firm support of net neutrality.
  5. Firm commitment to creating a connected democracy, where our citizens can actually listen to what is happening – hardly any representatives in congress put information on what bills they voted on on their websites.
  6. We need a national guard of techies to help get communications up again after a national emergency – for instance this was a difficult issue after Katrina. This bill was passed, but administration isn’t doing anything to build it.

Will be doing a press briefing etc on this and putting the petition up online.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of blogpost from sept 11, 2001, about blogger.com showing blog posts about the attacks
Networked Politics social media

25 years since September 11

I’ve been reading through my blog posts on September 11, 2001 and the days that followed. The things that stand out to me – in addition to the horror of the attack itself – are how massively we (or at least I) used the web to understand what was happening, […]

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]