Hanne-Lovise and I went to the Digital Play exhbition at the American Museum of the Moving Image yesterday. The exhibit consists of a series of games in their original form, and you can play them all, from Space Invaders and Asteroids (1979) through the first music game to hit the US (my goodness the interface and aesthetics have improved since 1997) to Rez, the EyeToy and Dance Dance Revolution. We knew of most of the games, and had sort of played several of them, but it was lovely having an empty gallery and plenty of time to play them and to experience the sequence and history of it all. I’m going to buy Rez. And maybe that guitar game, too.

Before you got to the games, a few computers displayed “new narratives” and animations. I wrote a separate review of the one I liked best, though I was disappointed that all the selected “new narratives” were singularly uninteractive. I suppose it’s the Museum of the Moving Image, not of interactivity.

As for the rest of the museum, well, I’ve obviously been completely spoilt by MOMI, the Museum of the Moving Image in London, which was tragically closed in 1999, and there are no real plans to reopen it. While the London MOMI, as I remember it, was largely about letting visitors explore how films are actually, the New York museum mostly consists of slightly dusty collections of movie paraphernalia, although there are some nice exhibits on the third floor that let you play at making animations, look at zoetropes and see a wonderful demostration of how come lots of still images look like fluid movement. You can see yourself superimposed on different backgrounds using a blue screen, too, but that’s it – in London you get to choose between pretending to be Superman flying over buildings and doing the weather forecast. They’ve done a much better job of narrativising it all.

On the other hand, it was totally luxurious having the museum practically to ourselves all afternoon. We had a lot of fun playing games, and a lovely dinner and such a nice time just hanging out.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

7 thoughts on “American Museum of the Moving Image

  1. andrew

    Doesn’t the AMMI have the entire history of all American TV shows on archive, that you can watch in kiosks? That’s probably the museum’s greatest value.

  2. Jill

    Does it? That sounds really cool! I didn’t see it, but I might have just missed it.

  3. Esther

    I’m shocked. I went to MOMI twice when it was open and it was the best museum (apart from the Imperial War Museum) I’ve ever been to. As a child I remember both the Superman and the news broadcast, and also the large amount of re-enactors throughout the museum making it properly interactive, including a huge screen showing sections from classic films to a equally classic series of soundtracks, complete with a perky gent telling us to all ‘get in line for the show, please, madame’. There was also a Jim Henson exhibition there at one point. I’m saddened it’s closed.

  4. Jill

    Yes, the news broadcast! And the reenactors were awesome. I agree, it’s really sad that it’s gone. I don’t know why they shut it down…

  5. David

    A whole room full of games and no need for quarters? Must be heaven for junior high schoolers. I’m surprised one could ever have the room to themself.

  6. Jill

    Uh, well, actually you only got three tokens for the arcade games – Space Invaders, Asteroids and Ms Pacman. If you wanted more tokens they cost a quarter each. The other games were free. If you don’t consider the US$10 entrace fee.

    It was great having the exhibition completely to ourselves, that’s for sure!

  7. Marika

    Andrew, I think that’s The museum of television and radio. I visited it in 1999, and it’s cool 🙂

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.