Search Here ….

Tags

affect AI AI slop AI STORIES alumni art autocorrect Blogging book ChatGPT conferences data analysis digital art electronic literature ELMCIP environmental art exhibition flies Gephi history journalister LLMs London machine vision market literature motherhood network analysis norsk open access Pierre Huyghe publication publications research science fiction self-representation selfies social media Surveillance talks teaching tracking trip report twitter UiB visualisation
Uncategorised

ada lovelace day

Jill4 Comments

Ada LovelaceI’m looking forward to Ada Lovelace Day, on March 24. Ada Lovelace was the first computer programmer, having written software for Babbage’s Analytical Machine in the 1840s. The machine was never built, so the software never ran, and she died young, but has still been an inspiration to women in computing ever since. The Ada Lovelace Day is an innovation this year, suggested by Suw Charman-Andersen, who pledge that “I will publish a blog post on Tuesday 24th March about a woman in technology whom I admire but only if 1,000 other people will do the same.” I signed her pledge, as have well over a thousand other bloggers, so the day is happening – and there’s always room for more bloggers!

The lack of visible women at technology conferences and in technology jobs has been a problem for many years, and lately there’s even been a worrying decline in the number of women studying computer science. Having positive female role-models is extremely important to young women. I know it’s been important to me – it’s simply hard to make the jump imagining myself in a role as a man in a suit, and much easier to figure out the kind of teacher, researcher or leader I want to be when I can see how different women who are far more experienced than me choose to fill these roles. I know there are many studies that support this too, and suggest it may be more important for women to have role-models of their own gender than it is for men – I should have references sorry, I only have the one right now.

So check out the pledge, the blog, and consider joining in yourself – and of course, check back here on March 24 to read my blog post about a woman in technology who’s inspired me.

Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “ada lovelace day”

  1. Hastur

    I signed up earlier today. I’ve been a big fan of Ada Lovelace for many years, the contrast between her and her pro-luddite father is simply beautiful and something I love to talk about.

    And since I haven’t written anything about her lately, I’ll probably end up writing about her on March 24.

  2. William Patrick Wend

    I just signed the pledge.

  3. gorida

    Jill, thanks for this post. I just signed the pledge. They had a link to facebook as well: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=47550446005#/event.php?eid=47550446005&ref=mf . PS: Grattis med Jessica. Lovely. Visste ikke at du hadde vÊrt s flink i fjor. 😀

  4. Life de Luxe » Bloggarkiv » Ada Lovelace day

    […] Hos Jill.txt l?§ste jag f??r ett tag sedan om Ada Lovelace day, och la in en liten p?•minnelse i min almanacka. ?ñver tusen bloggare har lovat att de idag ska skriva om kvinnliga f??rebilder p?• tekniska omr?•den – jag antar att det kommer att bli en ??vervikt mot IT. Jag har inte lovat n?•got och tror inte jag hinner bidra – jag har min tredje uppsatsintervju i kv?§ll och en fullmatad arbetsdag fram till dess. Men vi f?•r se! […]

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI and algorithmic culture University politics

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.