Ada LovelaceI’m looking forward to Ada Lovelace Day, on March 24. Ada Lovelace was the first computer programmer, having written software for Babbage’s Analytical Machine in the 1840s. The machine was never built, so the software never ran, and she died young, but has still been an inspiration to women in computing ever since. The Ada Lovelace Day is an innovation this year, suggested by Suw Charman-Andersen, who pledge that “I will publish a blog post on Tuesday 24th March about a woman in technology whom I admire but only if 1,000 other people will do the same.” I signed her pledge, as have well over a thousand other bloggers, so the day is happening – and there’s always room for more bloggers!

The lack of visible women at technology conferences and in technology jobs has been a problem for many years, and lately there’s even been a worrying decline in the number of women studying computer science. Having positive female role-models is extremely important to young women. I know it’s been important to me – it’s simply hard to make the jump imagining myself in a role as a man in a suit, and much easier to figure out the kind of teacher, researcher or leader I want to be when I can see how different women who are far more experienced than me choose to fill these roles. I know there are many studies that support this too, and suggest it may be more important for women to have role-models of their own gender than it is for men – I should have references sorry, I only have the one right now.

So check out the pledge, the blog, and consider joining in yourself – and of course, check back here on March 24 to read my blog post about a woman in technology who’s inspired me.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “ada lovelace day

  1. Hastur

    I signed up earlier today. I’ve been a big fan of Ada Lovelace for many years, the contrast between her and her pro-luddite father is simply beautiful and something I love to talk about.

    And since I haven’t written anything about her lately, I’ll probably end up writing about her on March 24.

  2. William Patrick Wend

    I just signed the pledge.

  3. gorida

    Jill, thanks for this post. I just signed the pledge. They had a link to facebook as well: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=47550446005#/event.php?eid=47550446005&ref=mf . PS: Grattis med Jessica. Lovely. Visste ikke at du hadde vÊrt s flink i fjor. 😀

  4. […] Hos Jill.txt l?§ste jag f??r ett tag sedan om Ada Lovelace day, och la in en liten p?•minnelse i min almanacka. ?ñver tusen bloggare har lovat att de idag ska skriva om kvinnliga f??rebilder p?• tekniska omr?•den – jag antar att det kommer att bli en ??vervikt mot IT. Jag har inte lovat n?•got och tror inte jag hinner bidra – jag har min tredje uppsatsintervju i kv?§ll och en fullmatad arbetsdag fram till dess. Men vi f?•r se! […]

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.