Urg. My trial lecture is the day after tomorrow. In 45 hours and 15 minutes I’ll be nervously waiting outside the door to Auditorium B with the prodekanus, the opponents and the head of my department. When the hands of our watches reach half past four we’ll walk in, in a little procession. At least I think we will. Maybe the procession’s only for the actual defence. Which is Tuesday. In 63 hours time.

I should have reread all the books I’ve cited in my dissertation. But first I have to finish that lecture. And the presentation for the defence. And and and and…


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 thoughts on “45 hours from now”

  1. hanna

    Don’t panic! You will do brilliantly!

  2. Matt K.

    Just so long as you don’t say “urg.”

  3. Lisa Firke

    Best of luck, Jill!

  4. Camilla

    Don’t worry Jill, you’ll do great 🙂

  5. Jamie

    You will be great!

    If you really think you need advice, remember:
    * you are brilliant
    * they know that you know more about your topic then they do and they want to discuss it with you as an equal (or at least a junior colleague)
    * you have got through much worse before — you are a strong person and when you believe in yourself you are capable of much more than defending something you have worked on for years
    * it might help you to imagine that you have already passed because then you won’t be nervous about that and then you can concentrate on enjoying the experience

    It is in some ways a rite of passage but, unlike many of those rites, everyone knows that you will more than succeed. I suspect that you are just nervous because this is such a big step. We all know that you will be great. Everything will fall into place. I know it will (or have I just been playing too much tetris?)

  6. Jill

    Oh, thanks, Jamie, everyone. At least it’ll be over soon….

    Unlike Tetris.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of blogpost from sept 11, 2001, about blogger.com showing blog posts about the attacks
Networked Politics social media

25 years since September 11

I’ve been reading through my blog posts on September 11, 2001 and the days that followed. The things that stand out to me – in addition to the horror of the attack itself – are how massively we (or at least I) used the web to understand what was happening, […]

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]