I’m 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 years old today! That means I get to be a two-year-old to the fifth degree all day long! I want BALLOONS!


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

25 thoughts on “2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2

  1. Christian

    Hurra!!! Hipp Hipp!! Well If you behave there is no limit on what the day might bring. 34 years(and doctor)………who would have belived that! 😉

  2. Jill

    No, no, Christian, your maths is out by two years! But thanks for the cheer!

  3. HÂkon Styri

    Gratulerer! (og s er det dobbelt s lenge til neste gang da vel?)

  4. Florine

    Gefeliciteerd met je 32ste verjaardag! 🙂

    (I bet you understand that, even though it’s in Dutch…)

  5. Jesper Juul

    And remember that 32 is only 20 in hexadecimal!

  6. Tormod Haugen

    and 100000 in binary 🙂 Have a really nice day.

  7. Liz

    Happy birthday, Jill!

  8. lisa

    Ah, just a baby…

    many happy returns.

  9. nick

    Baloons, eh? That’s a tall order in a proportional font, but I’ll try…

    O
    |

    †† o
    †† |

    ††††† O
    ††††† |

    Happy birthday!

  10. Francois Lachance

    And what colour of balloons does the birthday person desire? And how many?
    Let’s see
    2 to start with
    add four (2×2)
    that’s six
    add 8 (4×2)
    that’s fourteen
    add 16 (8×2)
    that’s thirty
    add 32 (16×2)
    that’s sixty-two

    I have a hunch you excursion into the mathematical realm of series is connected to your diving into the grammatical intricacies of tenses and mode in the conjugation of French verbs 🙂

    X 0 X [ the odd anachronistic yoking of Romuan numerals and Arabic zero ] to signify best wishes for carrying the joyous energy of the many twos and fives into the future beyond the thirties into the sixties !!!

  11. kirsty

    As a thirty-one-and-a-half year old I’m really glad you’ve pointed out that 2^5 is a cool birthday! Thanks! Have a lovely day!

  12. vika

    happy happy happy birthday!

  13. jon

    Happy Birthday Jill !

  14. elouise

    Happy diquadrano! (I just made that up). It only gets better with time(s two).

  15. Elin

    yay! Another year to put in the closet. I can’t even open my closet anymore, it is so loaded.
    Gratulerer med dagen!

  16. Robert

    Happy birthday, Jill. I hope you have a great 33rd year.

  17. George

    Speaking as one, I say 32-year-olds rawk! Happy birthday, Jill.

  18. mark

    Happy birthday!

  19. mcb

    yeay!

  20. Elin

    Jill – by the way – your css is all messed up on my mac – (IE5.1) – is it me…?
    Sgruphgh!

  21. Seb

    Happy birthday Jill!

  22. Clancy

    Happy belated birthday! 🙂

  23. Charles Magee

    Is that the Jill that I knew whom I said Happy Birthday in Leicester, UK on your 29 birthday? Happy 32 + 3 months birthday.

  24. Jill

    Hm, I don’t *think* I was in Leicester on my 29th birthday. No, I don’t think I’ve *ever* been in Leicester. Sorry!

  25. weezBlog

    In-utero Samba
    When it came time for my thesis work, I had scripted a piece called “Rosario’s Garden”. Had it storyboarded, had made my animatic…and I found out I was pregnant. Rather than fight it, I changed the subject of my thesis…

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.