Back to school for heads of (small) departments means:

  • Plan your teaching for the semester. As usual.
  • Coordinate orientation meetings.
  • Write a report about how the department will nurture research in next year.
  • Write a report evaluating the MA program.
  • Follow up on reorganisation plans. Remind people we exist.
  • Realise since everyone wants to use other teaching rooms than the one with the built in projector (because built-in-projector room has no windows and not enough seats for students) we now need more projectors. Frantic emails. Wish someone (like me) had thought of this earlier.
  • Realise can buy new projector. Arrange for one to be bought and installed in pleasant teaching room. Consider where money will come from.
  • Plan department seminars.
  • Set up roster for leading writing group for MA students.
  • Nag bookshop about more copies of dossier due to more students than expected.
  • Make sure Facade is installed in computer lab.
  • Arrange office space for people.
  • Try to get some research done.

I’ve done or am doing most of these things. It’s under control. It just takes way more time than I wish it would.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “what I’ve been up to

  1. Gro

    Don’t forget your friends at fabrikkgaten on your days working
    with research. we have coffee.

  2. Jill

    Ooh, yes! 🙂

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]