Like many others, I’ve been following the 99% movement in social media, intellectually interested in the use of social technology, and certainly engaged in the cause itself as well (from privileged Norway, certainly part of the 1% globally speaking).

Mike Konczal’s analysis of the constant posts to the We are the 99% Tumblr is an interesting read, and I’m also thinking a useful example for teaching digital methods to students, as I plan to do next semester in DIKULT251. Konczal wrote a script to pull out all the text from the site and analysed the data, picking out key words, ages of the people posting, and more. Here’s an example of a photo posted to the Tumblr:

Screenshot of a post to the 99% Tumblr of a woman holding a poster

Konczal’s script provides some pretty graphs, but he also attempts a more theoretical analysis of his findings, noting that the key words he finds are not for “cheap gas, cheaper credit, giant houses, bigger electronics” as some critics have assumed. The 99% posts aren’t even asking for trade unions, shorter work days or meaningful jobs:

Anthropologist David Graeber cites historian Moses Finley, who identified ìthe perennial revolutionary programme of antiquity, cancel debts and redistribute the land, the slogan of a peasantry, not of a working class.î And think through these cases. The overwhelming majority of these statements are actionable demands in the form of (i) free us from the bondage of these debts and (ii) give us a bare minimum to survive on in order to lead decent lives (or, in pre-Industrial terms, give us some land). In Finleyís terms, these are the demands of a peasantry, not a working class. (..) Itís straight out of antiquity ñ free us from the bondage of our debts and give us a basic ability to survive.

Another site I’ve been impressed with is OccupyTogether.org, which has become a hub of organisation that allows people all over the world to find or initiate their own protests. The initiators write that:

when we started this we were merely two designers who couldnít get to NYC to support in person. We saw these solidarity actions forming in other areas and though ìyou know, it would be great to gather this information and make it readily available and easily accessible for everyone!î Little did we know weíd go from listing 4-5 locations in one night to receiving hundreds of emails in a day.

They found that running everything manually through them actually slowed things down too much, and so when Meetup.com offered to help out they happily accepted. Now you can see how the movement is spreading not only across the United States, but across the world – there’s even an event planned in Bergen this Saturday, despite our already having universal health care, free higher education and a solid welfare safety net, which are the elements Konczal, at least, concludes would solve the 99%’s problems.

screenshot of OccuptyTogether's Meetup page

One of the creators of the 99% Tumblr argues that social media is educating people and that that is what makes the movement possible:

I don’t think this could have been possible without social media to link people to real information on wealth inequality, and to possible solutions that are on the table to help balance the power structure. Every time we go on the web, it is to learn something. Right now Occupy Wall Street is part of an essential education and conversation on wealth inequality so that people can bring their own demands and solutions to the table.

While one should be skeptical about uncritical belief in social media’s ability to save the world, this is an interesting point. Certainly visualisation of data, accessibility of data and easy sharing lets information get no matter whether the mainstream media promote it. Savvy websites like Motherjones provide easily sharable graphics that no doubt both provide them with traffic and the 99% with ammunition:

But perhaps the most important way social media helps this kind of movement is simply that you can see that you’re not alone and that there are other people willing to fight by your side. As Dr Rasha Abdullah says about the revolution in Egypt, there is immense power in seeing that 100,000 other people have signed up for the Facebook event “Revolution”. That way, you can be pretty sure that you won’t be alone when you hit the streets.

I’m going to have to try to learn how to do the sort of data analysis Konczal demonstrates. A method is revealed in a comment to his post (and this commenter claims to have found different results), and I suppose it’s not really very complicated. If I just learn how, right!?


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

7 thoughts on “the 99% movement’s use of social media

  1. Angie Stevens

    jill/txt » the 99% movement's use of social media http://t.co/py2HVVFw

  2. Catherine Shuler

    the 99% movement’s use of social media :: http://t.co/otFMNsVy

  3. […] Just the other day, I came across this useful post from Jill Walker Rettberg, which is also discussing this useful post from Mike “Rortybomb” Konczal, both about the use of social media and the Occupy Wall Street movement. ¬†Walker Rettberg is more or less summarizing Konczal’s analysis of the Tumblr site We Are the 99 Percent¬†and also of the site Occupy Together, which is a sort of hub for all things “Occupy-ish.” […]

  4. Angela Shetler

    The 99% movement's use of social media: http://t.co/LgHETujT (via @jilltxt) #OWS

  5. Enrique Gimenez

    "It’s straight out of antiquity – free us from the bondage of our debts and give us a basic ability to survive." http://t.co/tLYy32i6 #OWS

  6. Enrique Gimenez

    The 99% movement's use of social media: http://t.co/LgHETujT (via @jilltxt) #OWS

  7. Geoff Coleman

    I read: the 99% movement’s use of social media http://t.co/eRYPvI94 interesting stuff.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.