Let me show you how art and culture drive technological development.
Let me show you how art and culture drive technological development.
Oh no! Humanistic Informatics is far worse at publishing than Informatics. We’re even lagging 0.02 points behind Infomedia. Karltk explains all, in good old AD&D fashion.
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
At last week’s AI STORIES workshop, Gabriele de Seta led a workshop exploring Butterflies.ai, a social media platform where all the users are AIs. Gathering a group of researchers in a room for a few hours to explore and discuss a specific genAI platform turns out to be a really […]
When I studied literature we mostly read the classics. Great literature, the canon. But that’s not necessarily what most people actually read. What if instead of comparing AI-generated literature to the literary canon, we tried comparing it to super popular and commercial forms of literature instead? Like the folkebøker that […]
Synthetic media is a current popular term for AI-generated videos, texts and images. I think the first use was only a few years ago in 2018, but I couldn’t find an overview of its use so thought I’d cobble one together here, mostly because I like Elena Pilipets and her […]
OpenAI plans to charge $20,000 (USD) a month for an AI agent that can do “PhD level research”. Maybe all the PhDs and postdocs recently fired by DOGE should band together and sell their services as “AI agents” – apparently some people will pay more for robots than people. At […]
This is my original Norwegian draft of an essay published in the Danish foreign policy magazine Udenrigs today as part of a special issue on AI and foreign policy. I argue that AI is influencing the way we tell stories, and more seriously, that there is a risk of this […]
In 2022 I learned about FAIR data, the movement to make research data Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reproducible. One of UiB’s brilliant research librarians, Jenny Ostrup, patiently helped me make the dataset from the Machine Vision project FAIR in 2022 – I wrote a little bit about that in my […]
NumberCruncher
I could not reproduce Torleiv Kl¯veís results cited by Karltk, see my comments there. Here is an alternative ranking of the Overall Publication-Faculty Ratio and a new addition: The Prestige Publication-Faculty Ratio ñ where your department, HUMINF, does much better!
Overall Publication-Faculty Ratio
(Publication Points/Number of Faculty)
1. II-UiB: 1.96
2. IfI-UiO: 0.58
3. IDI-NTNU: 0.34
4. Infomedia-UiB: 0.33
5. HUMINF-UiB: 0.28
6. SFF QoS-NTNU: 0.22
7. IfI-Troms¯: 0.04
New: Prestige Publication-Faculty Ratio
(Level 2 Prestige Publication Share/Number of Faculty)
1. II-UiB: 0.24
2. HUMINF-UiB: 0.16
3. IfI-UiO: 0.06
4. IDI-NTNU: 0.04
5. SFF QoS-NTNU: 0.03
6. Infomedia-UiB: 0.02
7. IfI-Troms¯: 0.00
Note: The category ìNumber of Facultyî excludes administrative and support personnel. The ratios are based on data for the year 2004, available at http://dbh.nsd.uib.no/dbhvev/