Rune R¯sten’s written rather a nice little comparison of journalistic treatment of Bill Gate’s speech vs. blogged reports of it (May 5, no permalink, in Norwegian). The journalists he cites didn’t check the original speech but reproduced misinterpretations of it from other media. The bloggers R¯sten cites linked directly to the speech. And they’re unpretentious 😉 Rune R¯sten obviously gets blogs. I wonder whether he had to fight to get blogs into Dagbladet?

2 thoughts on “he gets blogs

  1. torill

    Actually, if you use the “comments” option on Dagbladets weblogg that lets you link directly to the entry, as if it was a permalink.

  2. Jill

    But I got an error message when I clicked the comments link. I suppose I could always try again…

Leave a Reply to torill Cancel reply

Recommended Posts

Image on a black background of a human hand holding a graphic showing the word AI with a blue circuit board pattern inside surrounded by blurred blue and yellow dots and a concentric circular blue design.
AI and algorithmic culture Machine Vision

Four visual registers for imaginaries of machine vision

I’m thrilled to announce another publication from our European Research Council (ERC)-funded research project on Machine Vision: Gabriele de Setaand Anya Shchetvina‘s paper analysing how Chinese AI companies visually present machine vision technologies. They find that the Chinese machine vision imaginary is global, blue and competitive.  […]