Whenever I give talks about ChatGPT and LLMs, whether to ninth graders, businesses or journalists, I meet people who are hungry for information, who really want to understand this new technology. I’ve interpreted this as interest and a need to understand – but yesterday, Eirik Solheim said that every time he gives a talk on ChatGPT he meets audiences who are afraid.

I was surprised to hear that. Have I misinterpreted my audiences? They certainly pay more attention to talks about ChatGPT than they do about many other subjects. The ninth graders who visited UiB a couple of weeks ago were EXTREMELY attentive to the short talk I did for them about how LLMs work, and about AI bias and how My AI in Snapchat works. There wasn’t a single whisper or yawn. It actually never occurred to me that they might be scared rather than fascinated, absorbed, eager to learn.

What is your impression? Are people paying attention to AI because they are scared? Or is it amazement?

I’ll have to do an anonymous survey at my next talk, a Kahoot or Mentimeter or something – I tried asking the audience yesterday after Eirik’s point, but of course nobody put their hand up in answer to “Are you scared?”

The photos below are from the not just one, but two talks I did yesterday on ChatGPT: at a breakfast meeting for the Bergen Chamber of Commerce and at a lunch event for journalists and students at Media City Bergen, where I was on a panel with Eirik Solheim and Chris Ronald Hermansen, led by Lasse Lambrechts.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

1 Comment

  1. Tin

    Am I frightened? That’s maybe overstating the case.
    Am I concerned, sometimes very deeply? Yes, definitely, and this explains just one of the reasons: https://reclaimthefacts.com/en/2023/04/07/exploring-the-risks-of-ai-in-spreading-misinformation-about-climate-change/

    But a huge concern is actually also that these AI companies are benefitting monetarily from unpaid work that hundreds of thousands of people have put into their websites, community projects, stories and all of the other things AI has scraped. Many of these websites, projects and stories are labours of love, often written and maintained by women, who are anyway already at the losing end of the wage gap.

    As far as I’m concerned, this is just another case of Silicon Valley tech bros getting rich on the unpaid work of others, including women and minorities.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

From 17th century book factories to AI-generated literature

When I studied literature we mostly read the classics. Great literature, the canon. But that’s not necessarily what most people actually read. What if instead of comparing AI-generated literature to the literary canon, we tried comparing it to super popular and commercial forms of literature instead? Like the folkebøker that […]