[Post in progress] Title of the talk is a quote from Castells. Will talk about some of the mechanisms in networks, looking at relationships between organisations rather than between individual people.

German sociologist has listed twenty-six distinct definitions of “information”, and Arne suspects that “network” might be a similar kind of concept, the sort of concept you should just forget about trying to find a single defintion of.

Although network theory has been very efficient, there are problems with it too. We haven’t been able to use networks as organisational toolf/methods.

Advantages of network organisation: Scalable, interactive, flexible, tailored, branded, global, alliances, increased specialisation.

Communication used to be expensive. Coordination used be done through meetings, telephone, paper. We’re very strongly marked by these methods and have trouble not using them. Traditional kinds of coordination favourise organisations with few connections, few ties. Also there’s goign to be information filtering because it’s expensive to give out information, and that also means lots of people are kept out of the loop, not given information.

With the internet: communication is cheap. But how should we use it? New technologies tend to emulate old, expensive technologies, like IP-phones. Castells: “The network is the message.” 75% of productivity gains in the next five years will come through improved collaboration, better connections. Right now Microsoft Office doesn’t do collaboration well at all, but they’re working on it and it will become essential.

Economy is the understanding of scarce resources in a society.

Digital services: “products” become services when they’re online. E.g. a book is tax-free if printed on paper (in Norway) but if you put it online it’s a service and so if you sell it you have to add tax.

Increasing returns – it’s trivial to make more copies so you make mroe and more money the more you sell.
Diminishing returns – you actually lose money if you sell more than so and so many of a product. It costs as much to make another box as I earn more.

E.g. I sell you a phone. I make a cut.
THEN I add you to my network. That costs me nothing.
The more people in my network, the more you’ll ring. So I make more and more money.

(though I dunno, surely more and more customers also requires more questions to be answered, more servers and so on, but I suppose this is simplified)

The net can reduce some of the standard transaction costs – like searching for a product, negotiating, deciding etc.

Commodification: more and more products becoming standardised. E.g. content management systems. Digital services globalised.
[bit I was too tired to follow, sorry :/]

Anecdot about his kids who never plan ahead, they’re used to instant coordination with their friends. How would we plan an organisation that supports this? Today’s organisation either assume we can’t do this or they pretty much stop us from using these abilities and require slow planning.

3 thoughts on “notes: Arne Krokan on “The network is the Organisation”

  1. kyan gadac

    Jill wrote:
    (though I dunno, surely more and more customers also requires more questions to be answered, more servers and so on, but I suppose this is simplified)
    … the devils in the details. … there’s no such thing as a free cliche…I think there’s a degree of enthusiasm for the wonders of networks at work here.
    But the anecdote about kids bought to mind Noongar(Aboriginal) networks which are based on kinshiip, which extends family neworks to the whole of the world. Noongar people talk about ‘Noongar grapevine’ and ‘Noongar time’ to describe the person who knows when to turn up. Without being asked. Early settlers in W.A. were bewildered by there seeming irrational behaviour. Rishing of on a whim. it seemed to them. But in the light of this new enthusiasm, perhaps they are the people who we should be asking about the internet. Perhaps ‘Noongar time’ has come!

  2. Jill

    That’s fascinating, I might look into that. Thanks!

  3. […] Dette siste er et interessant fenomen, fordi det etterhvert blir vanlig at mange personer formidler direkte fra ulike seminarer og foredrag. Det er mange ?•r siden Jill Walker blogget direkte fra et foredrag jeg holdt p?• Universitetet i Oslo, og siden har det tatt om seg. Jeg blogget fra Internetworld i London i slutten av april, og flere blogget direkte fra Nkul som gikk av stabelen ved NTNU med en rekke foredrag og seminarer i begynnelsen av mai. […]

Leave a Reply to Jill Cancel reply

Recommended Posts

Machine Vision Presentations

Drones in Society conference

I’m (virtually) attending Elisa Serifinalli’s conference Drones in Society: New Visual Aesthetics today, and will be presenting work-in-progress exploring how drones are presented in the 500 novels, movies, artworks, games and other stories that we have analysed in the Database of Machine […]

Machine Vision

Cultural Representations of Machine Vision: An Experimental Mixed Methods Workshop

Call for submissions to a workshop, Bergen, Norway
Workshop dates: 15-17 August 2022
Proposals due: 15 June

The Machine Vision in Everyday Life project invites proposals for an interdisciplinary workshop using qualitative approaches and digital methods to analyse how machine vision is represented in art, science fiction, games, social media and other forms of cultural and aesthetic expression.

Digital Humanities Machine Vision

What do different machine vision technologies do in fiction and art?

For the Machine Vision in Everyday Life project we’ve analysed how machine vision technologies are portrayed and used in 500 works of fiction and art, including 77 digital games, 190 digital artworks and 233 movies, novels and other narratives. You can browse […]