This presentation is interesting: he’s discussing Walkerdine’s discussion of how children say “I” about their avatar and the “complex indentification”. abstract.

Against the idea of immersion:

  • Holodek myth (ryan 2001)
  • Myth of the ergodic (Newman 200?)
  • The idea of the Interactive Illusion (Linderoth 2004)
  • The immersive fallacy (Salen & Zimmerman 2004)
  • Oh dear, I can’t concentrate enough to type and listen. Giving up, but this looks like an interesting, might get a copy.)

    [Analyses a sequence between two children playineg a game.]

    Therefore Jonas Linderoth claims (in contrast to Walkerdine) that the use of “I” is simple everyday linguistics, and not specific to gameplay. For instance, when riding a horse, we’ll say “I galloped” not “the horse galloped”. It’s to do with extending agency outside of our body.

    –> the avatar can be a role, a tool and/or a prop (part of the players representation of self).


    Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    Leave A Comment

    Recommended Posts

    Triple book talk: Watch James Dobson, Jussi Parikka and me discuss our 2023 books

    Thanks to everyone who came to the triple book talk of three recent books on machine vision by James Dobson, Jussi Parikka and me, and thanks for excellent questions. Several people have emailed to asked if we recorded it, and yes we did! Here you go! James and Jussi’s books […]