In many ways I preferred blogging as an outsider, as a lowly PhD student with no established position other than that of the outsider: a young woman in a small country on the outskirts of a continent with odd interests. Blogging as a tenured associate professor running a (small) department is a different kettle of fish altogether, as I tried to analyse in my hard-to-write chapter in Uses of Blogs. I’ve mostly thought of the discomfort of blogging in the last year or so as being about time, authority, too many different audiences and having to try to be tactical and smart non-stop. Weez points out another problem I hadn’t thought of this clearly before:

Things became clear from this dream structure…the more connections you have – whether laterally or vertically, the less freedom of movement you have. Those at the periphery have much more latitude to take risks and move in odd directions. Innovation happens at the edges. This structure was animated. It was like a jelly fish. You could move with the thing or against the thing. Wherever there was movement there were tensions. Opposing tensions ended in a sum of no movement, but there was at least a tightening and loosening. It was kinetic there. But if the majority did absolutely nothing, that too was a statement and made the whole thing look like it was dead. (Weez, Oct 3)

Thank goodness for research and the chance to escape into ideas and thoughts and writing.

1 Comment

  1. Norman Hanscombe

    Freedom of action may be greater at the periphery; but change tends to occur only when it’s taken on board nearer the centre. The difficulties associated with bringing about change tend to fall into two main categories. When you’re at the centre, it’s convincing colleagues to take the risk of endangering whatever powers they may have to try to bring about change. At the periphery the problem is trying to persuade people that the pleasures they may derive from coming up with wonderful dreams about what would improve the world, can’t help bring about changes unless they are able to be applied in the real world.

    Thank God I’m an optimist, or I’d find the world a bleak place.

Leave a Reply to Norman Hanscombe Cancel reply

Recommended Posts

Machine Vision Presentations

Drones in Society conference

I’m (virtually) attending Elisa Serifinalli’s conference Drones in Society: New Visual Aesthetics today, and will be presenting work-in-progress exploring how drones are presented in the 500 novels, movies, artworks, games and other stories that we have analysed in the Database of Machine […]

Machine Vision

Cultural Representations of Machine Vision: An Experimental Mixed Methods Workshop

Call for submissions to a workshop, Bergen, Norway
Workshop dates: 15-17 August 2022
Proposals due: 15 June

The Machine Vision in Everyday Life project invites proposals for an interdisciplinary workshop using qualitative approaches and digital methods to analyse how machine vision is represented in art, science fiction, games, social media and other forms of cultural and aesthetic expression.

Digital Humanities Machine Vision

What do different machine vision technologies do in fiction and art?

For the Machine Vision in Everyday Life project we’ve analysed how machine vision technologies are portrayed and used in 500 works of fiction and art, including 77 digital games, 190 digital artworks and 233 movies, novels and other narratives. You can browse […]