My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI aesthetics to make posters promoting solar power. They’re sharing the images in social media and also posting them at train stations, as shown in the image above. (Heimatstrom which means homeland electricity; Heimat has Nazi associations.)

Now they’re also getting some media attention (paywalled in Frankfurter Allgemein, and another in Volksverpeter) and that’s how I discovered them: Roland Meyer posted this link to a news story on Bluesky:

«Dass er zur Erstellung der Bilder auch noch Elon Musks energiefressenden und grundwassersaugenden Bildgenerator ‹Grok› nutzt, stört ihn nicht. Das aber offenbart … ein mangelndes Bewusstsein für die ideologische Ausrichtung solcher KI-generierter Bilder mit ihrem Hang zur Retro-Nostalgie …» ?

Roland Meyer (@bildoperationen.bsky.social) 2026-05-03T15:03:41.162Z

At first I didn’t get the joke, which may be because of my poor German – or perhaps I just assume that the far right might also be interested in clean energy. Here in Norway wanting to have a completely off-the-grid cabin with solar power and batteries is certainly not a desire that is specific to the left, and to be honest I’m not very informed about far-right energy policies outside of Trump’s bizarre love of oil and coal.

Image by Heimatstromg, slogan reads: Heimatstrom for independence! Don’t get your money from the sheik, build your own Reich (nation/kingdom/empire). Posted on Reddit, April 2026.

Critics point out both that it can be seen as duplicitous to use energy-intensive AI to generate images promoting clean energy, and that the images seem to assume that the far-right is against clean energy, which may not be true.

I’m interested in the rhetorical effect of the fascist visual aesthetics. It’s referencing fascism in two ways. First, it’s obviously AI-generated, which by now is strongly associated with Trump’s crazy images. If you haven’t already read Gareth Watkin’s AI: The New Aesthetics of Fascism, you should do so. Second, it explicitly uses the visual style of – well, not all actually Nazi propaganda per se, but wartime propaganda.

Take a look at this image.

Image by Heimatstrom, reading “German sun, German energy! I make my contributions – do you?”

That’s not based on Nazi propaganda, it’s American: this is clearly based on J. Howard Miller’s “We Can Do It!” poster from 1943, which was made for Westinghouse Electric to inspire factory workers.

J. Howard Miller’s “We Can Do It!” poster from 1943 for Westinghouse Electric.

The busy background of the AI version is very AI, isn’t it, but the determined person with their fist is an obvious reproduction of the woman in Miller’s poster. Her replacement by a man could just be standard AI bias but I am so curious about the prompt here. Maybe generative AI just loves to insert American culture into anything, even pseudo-fascist German satire? For an LLM, the shared visual style and time period likely mean that the connection between the images is stronger than the divide between the Axis and the Allies.

In Norway we have had our own AI-generated image campaign recently for Dieselbrølet, “the diesel roar”, a campaign by truckers to reduce the price of diesel. There appears to be no irony in their use of AI-generated images. Or maybe there is and I’m just not getting it. Here is one of their images, posted to one of their Facebook groups:

Image posted to the FB group “YES to environment, NO to road tolls!” The text on the poster reads “Meet at Esso at Kløfta, 10 April at 10:45 am. We will block Oslo and the container and petroleum port at Sjursøya! Protest against the government and greedy oil companies!” (All text translated from Norwegian to English by me)

This is much closer to the apocalyptic aesthetics of Trump’s recent images. The fire and exploding oil tanks are like an action movie, beautiful in their furious destruction. The truck at the top left is very much an American truck, Norwegian trucks don’t look like that. The black smoke pumping out of the truck is remarkable. Why is that there? The man in the yellow vest and black mask looks like he’s from ICE, threatening, with that pointing finger, threatening, confrontational. To me it feels like a declaration of war, a statement that if you’re not with us, you’re against us.

The environmental politics here is a bit confusing. The oil companies are greedy, but it’s the government the protest is against. The price of diesel increased due to the Iran war, and the Norwegian government actually removed taxes on petrol and diesel (probably in contravention of EU/EØS rules) several days before the protests were held. And one of the Facebook groups the images were posted to is called YES to environment, NO to road tolls – they don’t see themselves as anti-enviornmentalists.

Compare Dieselbrølet’s poster to this one from Heimatstrom. Heimatstrom’s is certainly less heartfelt. The image makes fun of that naked man holding up a charging cable to the sun. Who would this appeal to? I suppose it might make a left-wing viewer laugh, which in a way is as “us vs them” as the pointing finger and threats of chaos from Dieselbrølet.

Image by Heimatstrom, Reddit April 2026. “Electric motors. From German sun. For our future. For our independence. Independence from foreign power!”

How seriously should we take this, though? I picked images from a small subreddit that’s only a month old and where people are obviously trying out different approaches.

In that sense, Dieselbrølet’s transition to AI might be more worth paying attention to. They’ve been around for several years, so the shift in aesthetics is very clear. Here is a full-page ad in a local newspaper for one of their previous protests, held in 2019. The ad was reposted to their Facebook groups, and is typical of their aesthetics at the time: black, red, grey, and very clear instructions about what to do and where to go. This is very different from the poster above which also promotes a specific protest.

The aesthetics of the banners they put on their trucks is also not AI-generated, and more in line with the earlier posters – perhaps they used old banners. Here is an image posted on 29 April to the Facebook group Dieselbrølet that shows the banner on the front of a truck.

Photo by chrstn_dlchw, posted to the Heimatstrom subreddit in April 2026.

Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.