The 2007 Digital Economy Fact Book is a 200 page PDF of statistics and data about the internet and usage; as the Hill Library Blog writes, “a tightwad researcherís dream: In-depth, statistic-heavy, well-cited, and freely-available online. One could hardly ask for more.” It’s published by The Progress and Freedom Foundation, which sounds a little scary – they’re “a market-oriented think tank that studies the digital revolution and its implications for public policy”, according to their mission statement. Reading on, I see they want governments to “resist the temptation to regulate, tax and control”, and one of their goals is to “explain[..] the imperative to protect rich digital content and encourage innovation through the traditional legal notions of copyright and patent”. I imagine they don’t like open source, open access, the creative commons or Lawrence Lessig. Their sponsors include traditional big media industry names from Disney through Clear Channel, Microsoft and AT&T – and Google, for some reason.

So this is hardly objective research, or at least, it’s not research conducted to find out the truth: it’s research conducted to make the argument that we should retain traditional copyright and keep control in the hands of the big corporations rather than the government or the people.

And yet there are certainly lots of graphs, charts, figures and so on, all with sources given, and certainly this tightwad researcher may have a look at them next time she needs some info. But I’ll take them with a grain of salt.

5 thoughts on “the 2007 digital economy fact book: 200 pages of (pro-copyright, anti-government regulation) statistics for free

  1. […] The Digital Economy Fact Book Posted mars 3, 2008 Jill Walker har en interessant omtale av The Digital Economy Fact Book. Denne studien er i f??lge Jill et bestillingsverk fra medieindustrien, og f??lgelig b??r en kanskje ta konklusjonene med en klype salt (eller noe lignende). Men uansett er det en samling av mye interessant statistikk. […]

  2. Dan Britton

    2007 and 2008 DEFB co-author here. Although I could understand why someone would be skeptical of the neutrality of this publication, it’s really not intended to be a political tool at all, or at least I never had that impression when I was working on it. It’s more of a “just-the-facts-ma’am” summary of all the information we could find on various Internet and communications-related topics. I admit there were some topics, such as the section on “Piracy,” where the one could interpret some data as being political in nature, but most of the content was merely restating what various (mostly politically neutral) groups and researchers had already found. Other than the two or three (out of about 60) sections that dealt with copyright, views on copyright law rarely entered into the writing of the book at all.

    FWIW, I no longer work at PFF, and though I generally agreed with most of the viewpoints taken by my former coworkers, as a lifelong left-leaner, I wouldn’t say that I have a great desire to keep power “in the hands of the big corporations rather than the government or the people.”

    But thanks for the mention anyway, no hard feelings! 🙂

  3. Jill Walker Rettberg

    Thanks for commenting, Dan – it’s very useful to hear this straight from the horse’s mouth, so to speak. The information you’ve compiled is certainly very useful, though I think it’s always useful to to be aware of how surveys can lean in one direction or another.

  4. […] Today I found a comment in my moderation queue from Dan Britton, a co-author of The 2007 digital economy fact book, a freely available collection of statistics on the digital economy which I had blogged a few months ago, calling it 200 pages of (pro-copyright, anti-government regulation) statistics. Dan Britton explains that while he can see how the section on piracy, for instance, might be interpretated as having a political agenda, “itís really not intended to be a political tool at all, or at least I never had that impression when I was working on it”. Interesting to have a bit of an insight into the process of making the book – though I still think there’s reason to be aware that even statistics may be skewed. Filed under:General — Jill @ 12:03 [ ] […]

  5. […] Today I found a comment in my moderation queue from Dan Britton, a co-author of The 2007 digital economy fact book, a freely available collection of statistics on the digital economy which I had blogged a few months ago, calling it 200 pages of (pro-copyright, anti-government regulation) statistics. Dan Britton explains that while he can see how the section on piracy, for instance, might be interpretated as having a political agenda, “itís really not intended to be a political tool at all, or at least I never had that impression when I was working on it”. Interesting to have a bit of an insight into the process of making the book – though I still think there’s reason to be aware that even statistics may be skewed. Filed under:General — Jill @ 12:03 [ ] […]

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Triple book talk: Watch James Dobson, Jussi Parikka and me discuss our 2023 books

Thanks to everyone who came to the triple book talk of three recent books on machine vision by James Dobson, Jussi Parikka and me, and thanks for excellent questions. Several people have emailed to asked if we recorded it, and yes we did! Here you go! James and Jussi’s books […]

Image on a black background of a human hand holding a graphic showing the word AI with a blue circuit board pattern inside surrounded by blurred blue and yellow dots and a concentric circular blue design.
AI and algorithmic culture Machine Vision

Four visual registers for imaginaries of machine vision

I’m thrilled to announce another publication from our European Research Council (ERC)-funded research project on Machine Vision: Gabriele de Setaand Anya Shchetvina‘s paper analysing how Chinese AI companies visually present machine vision technologies. They find that the Chinese machine vision imaginary is global, blue and competitive.  De Seta, Gabriele, and Anya Shchetvina. “Imagining Machine […]

Do people flock to talks about ChatGPT because they are scared?

Whenever I give talks about ChatGPT and LLMs, whether to ninth graders, businesses or journalists, I meet people who are hungry for information, who really want to understand this new technology. I’ve interpreted this as interest and a need to understand – but yesterday, Eirik Solheim said that every time […]