It will be fascinating to see the memorial building at the site of the WTC in New York (sorry, New York Times link, free registration required. You could try username jilltxt, password jilltxt). I’m absurdly proud that it’s designed by Norwegian architectual firm Sn¯hetta and find it rather surprising that they’d choose non-Americans for such a symbolic strcutre. Everything about the project drips with symbolism, of course, starting with its name, “Freedom Center”. The American insistance on “freedom” as basic tenet of their nation is astounding, and apparently entirely unironic. To me “Freedom Center” sounds rather like the sort of name the Soviet or maoist China would have chosen for a memorial. But I think Americans hear and use the word “freedom” differently than I do.

The New York Times reporter does, in fact, use the word “Orwellian” about the building, but not (as I would) about its name.

But the experience soon becomes Orwellian. The center’s upper-level galleries will be arranged in a spiral around the central light well. Under the current design, visitors will have to ride an elevator to the top and then walk back down along the spiral on a so-called “Freedom Walk.”

Martin comments on this with an analysis that seems convincing to me:

I think it’s interesting that the NY Times critic is highly skeptical of the fact that, after taking the lift to the top of the building, one is forced to take a long, spiraling walk down a spiral path inside the building’s light well. He thinks of it as a removal of freedom of the visitor, and even calls it “totalitarian.” I think the symbolism of this walk is highly appropriate. I read it as being simultaneously a criticism of the erosion of civil rights and the respect for human rights under a US administration which claims to celebrate freedom (a spiraling descent into unfreedom caused by the fall from the top – that is, the fall of the towers), and a reminder of the neccesity of – and conditions for real freedom: work, dedication and having the ability to think and work in the long term. The building seems to say that freedom is not easily won, which seems appropriate.

Interesting, too, that the New York Times reporter calls the building “a theme-park view of American ideals in an alluring wrapper” and also deplores the lack of bi-partisanality in the choices made — apparently only republicans have been allowed to determine the politics of it all. Towards the end of the article, the reporter writes that “the Freedom Center is bound to be viewed by much of the world as a jingoistic propaganda tool. What is missing at ground zero is a sense of humility.”

It sounds like a building full of ambivalence and self-contradiction. And beauty. Rather like the USA.

4 thoughts on “freedom center

  1. Anthony

    I first saw photographs and designs of the work of Snohetta several years ago when the firm desgined the library at Alexandria, Egypt. What beautiful lines in that design!

  2. John Norvell

    I don’t think we Americans hear the word “freedom” at all anymore. Our Venerated Leader has stripped it of all meaning.

  3. Martin G. L.

    Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom Freedom

    It’s like that game we play when we’re children. Say something enough, and it just becomes sound with affective connotations.

    Here’s some other ones:

    Security Security Security Security Security Security Security Security Security Security Security Security Security Security Security Security Security Security Security Security Security Security

    or

    Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism Terrorism

    or

    Patriotism Patriotism Patriotism Patriotism Patriotism Patriotism Patriotism Patriotism Patriotism Patriotism Patriotism Patriotism Patriotism Patriotism Patriotism Patriotism Patriotism Patriotism

    …I love the work of Sn¯hetta. They’re even more amazing when you see them yourself. The buildings have a very powerful presence, and they are amazing at taking location into account. The two I’ve seen seem to *fit* the place they’re located so well.

  4. infobong.com

    simple quest for answers

    I think I will take a charter bus to Crawford Saturday, to support Cindy Sheehan and participate in the anti-war rally near the Bush compound. The bus leaves from the LBJ library parking, which is a convenient walk from my…

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Triple book talk: Watch James Dobson, Jussi Parikka and me discuss our 2023 books

Thanks to everyone who came to the triple book talk of three recent books on machine vision by James Dobson, Jussi Parikka and me, and thanks for excellent questions. Several people have emailed to asked if we recorded it, and yes we did! Here you go! James and Jussi’s books […]

Image on a black background of a human hand holding a graphic showing the word AI with a blue circuit board pattern inside surrounded by blurred blue and yellow dots and a concentric circular blue design.
AI and algorithmic culture Machine Vision

Four visual registers for imaginaries of machine vision

I’m thrilled to announce another publication from our European Research Council (ERC)-funded research project on Machine Vision: Gabriele de Setaand Anya Shchetvina‘s paper analysing how Chinese AI companies visually present machine vision technologies. They find that the Chinese machine vision imaginary is global, blue and competitive.  De Seta, Gabriele, and Anya Shchetvina. “Imagining Machine […]

Do people flock to talks about ChatGPT because they are scared?

Whenever I give talks about ChatGPT and LLMs, whether to ninth graders, businesses or journalists, I meet people who are hungry for information, who really want to understand this new technology. I’ve interpreted this as interest and a need to understand – but yesterday, Eirik Solheim said that every time […]